Thanks for all your opinions and insight.
The doctor I went to is considered the top specialist in the SF Bay Area, if not all of Northern California. He's done the eyes of a bunch of sports atheletes here. Of course considering the state of the sports teams in the Bay Area...maybe that isn't such a good thing! (Go Sharks!!)
Re. the monovision, they were actually able to duplicate what it would be like in the Dr.'s office. While it was a tad disorienting in the beginning
in a few minutes it worked great. I could read up close and I could also see 20/15 in the distance. One of the main reason I'm considering this is because I sing in a large community choir and if I get my eyes set just for distance then I'd need reading glasses for the music, which would then make the choral director all blurry in the distance. Or I could opt for the granny glasses style and have my head bobbing up and down while I'm on stage like some deranged cockatoo!
I have a friend who had his eyes done for distance and when we've gone to restaurants for lunch he sometimes forgets his reading glasses and can't read the menu. (Which would be VERY Important when I'm searching for my Lean and Green...)
Also, the doctor said that any time I decide that I don't like the monovision I can have the reading eye adjusted for distance also at no additional cost. As he explained it to me, that is always an option if I try the monovision, and it is very "easy" to do. But if I go with distance only, then it's very, very difficult to adjust one of the eyes for reading only.
I'm going to keep thinking about it, and will get a second opinion, however. Thanks for all your input. ANd if any of you know of someone who has monovision could you ask them how it's working out for them. Jump4joy's friend seemed less than enthused about it.
Thanks again,
Carmel